
I’ve talked prior to now (right here and right here) concerning the idea of whether or not there’s a level past which train turns into an excessive amount of of a superb factor. Since I’m at all times tempted to push the envelope on this, I made a decision to ask Google Gemini deep analysis to research it for me: Endurance Train Quantity, Depth and Human Longevity. It got here up with this report, which is summarized on this podcast derived from the report. It’s an fascinating replace. Prior to now some research have appeared to point out a “U-shaped curve” of longevity vs train quantity: Train reduces all-cause mortality, with the profit rising with extra train, up to some extent. After that, mortality threat will increase once more. This isn’t born out in meta-analyses of nearly all of research, nonetheless. As a substitute, all-cause mortality continues to go down irrespective of how a lot you train. However past a sure level, we’re at larger threat of creating sure cardiac abnormalities like Afib or scarring of the guts. This appears to be extra possible for these doing a whole lot of excessive depth coaching.
So for those who’re like me and revel in a number of endurance coaching, it’s a good suggestion to observe a system like polarized coaching the place most of your coaching is at straightforward depth, with a minority of exercises at larger depth. Different suggestions are additionally given within the report like presumably present process cardiac screening to attenuate the chance of cardiac abnormalities. As a result of I had a heart-valve substitute prior to now I’m below the continued care of a heart specialist, and am glad to get periodically screened.


